We got a 2-day extension for a fund drive. Can we make it count? Forward this link to all your friends, and let’s make this year’s election count:
Donation page on fundable.com
Tags: Action
Fight for Your Information Rights
We got a 2-day extension for a fund drive. Can we make it count? Forward this link to all your friends, and let’s make this year’s election count:
Donation page on fundable.com
Breaking news - donate to GeekPAC! 3 days remain on our fund drive.
The Democratic National Convention is now over, and it’s time to take an account of what was (or wasn’t) said. Despite being regaled by some outstanding speeches by very powerful politicians, there were quite a few things left out of the mix. And let’s be serious - I wasn’t expecting to hear them, but it helps to recount what was left unsaid just for the record.
Here’s a small list:
Each of the above wasn’t addressed for a specific reason, because each of the above has a very specific special interest group behind the status quo. For #1 and #4, the perpetrators are obvious. For #2, look no further than many of the software providors for our schools. And no, I’m not addressing any particular company, for there are many. For #3 and #5, think of all the high tech vendors who have a vested interest in the status quo, and they have learned their way around Washington, DC. For #6, well, we all have a hand in that one. In order to get past the Information Divide, we pretty much have to come to terms with its primary cause: the mauling of the marketplace of ideas at the hands of government.
And lastly, what I’m most disappointed not to hear is one iota of support behind the idea that information rights are now human rights. I explain the details of this more thoroughly in the GeekPAC position paper, but the gist is that data and information are vastly more important than our current laws would indicate. As such, our continued development as an technological powerhouse depends on their overhaul and drastic reform. With our dependence on digital data, digital resources, and digital transactions, it behooves us to recognize their importance and introduce a bit of sanity into our legal structures, such as:
And I’m not holding my breath that we’ll hear anything at the Republican Convention either. Now you should understand why I always say that we are people without a party. Those who support these issues must create politically viable groups and influence elections and legislation.
Oh, did I mention that GeekPAC is having a fundraiser RIGHT NOW?
Donate to GeekPAC and fight for your information rights!
We’re entering the stretch run of our fundraiser, and we’ve crossed the 50% barrier! If you haven’t donated yet, now’s your chance:
Coming soon: a donor’s page thanking those who have pledged.
I’m happy to announce that BytesFree.org will be represented at its first event, Lug Radio Live, which will be held at the Metreon in San Francisco on April 12th and 13th. It’s quite a challenge to get things going organizationally, and this looks to be a pretty rewarding experience.
We will have a table at the expo. Also, Ilan and I will be speaking on Sunday at 3pm.
If you’d like to come by and say hello, or if you’re interested in volunteering, please do let us know.
To give some background on this issue, New York was the 5th state last year with some form of open formats legislation:
In its 2007 session, the New York State Legislature directed NYS Chief Information Officer/Director of the Office For Technology, Melodie Mayberry-Stewart, to gather stakeholder input regarding the mechanisms and processes for obtaining access to and reading electronic data so that such data can be created, maintained, exchanged, and preserved by the state in a manner that encourages appropriate government control, access, choice, interoperability, and vendor neutrality.
The original deadline for the request for comment was in December but has now been extended to January 18. See the instructions for the Request for Public Comment (RFPC) here. The RFPC directs interested parties to send email to erecords-study@oft.state.ny.us
For the last couple of months, I’ve had the idea that there should be a place where interested persons can find info on what politicians and candidates have received donations from the MPAA, RIAA, Microsoft’s anti-ODF works, etc. I figure bytesfree.org is as good a place as any.
Fortunately, the data is out there and publicly accessible, but there are all sorts of challenges - the info is uneven, in disparate locations, and (perhaps ironically) in a variety of difficult-to-import formats. The long and short of it is that it’s a lot of grunt work: copying, pasting, massaging, and my personal favorite: data entry.
But keep your eye out for the BytesFree.org Voter Information Project - it will only get better from here.
Thanks to Ilan, the founder of SCALE, I was notified of this list of 50 congresspeople who take money from the RIAA. Here’s the breakdown (from Consumerist.com):
Congressperson Receiving Contributions From The RIAA Amount Dist 19-FL WEXLER, ROBERT DEM $9,000 Dist 21-TX SMITH, LAMAR REP $7,500 Senate-UT HATCH, ORRIN G REP $6,000 Senate-PA SPECTER, ARLEN REP $5,000 Senate-AK STEVENS, THEODORE F REP $5,000 Senate-NE NELSON, E BENJAMIN DEM $5,000 Senate-CA FEINSTEIN, DIANNE DEM $4,000 Dist 45-CA BONO, MARY REP $4,000 Senate-FL NELSON, BILL DEM $4,500 Dist 08-FL KELLER, RICHARD A REP $4,054 Dist 07-NJ FERGUSON, MIKE REP $4,000 Dist 28-CA BERMAN, HOWARD L DEM $3,500 Dist 29-CA SCHIFF, ADAM DEM $3,000 Dist 30-CA WAXMAN, HENRY A. DEM $3,000 Dist 07-MO BLUNT, ROY REP $3,100 Dist 06-TN GORDON, BARTON JENNINGS DEM $3,000 Dist 06-VA GOODLATTE, ROBERT W. REP $3,500 Senate-IL OBAMA, BARACK DEM $2,000 Dist 14-IL HASTERT, DENNIS J. REP $2,000 Dist 07-MA MARKEY, EDWARD J MR. DEM $2,000 Dist 05-MD HOYER, STENY HAMILTON DEM $2,000 Dist 14-MI CONYERS, JOHN JR. DEM $2,000 Dist 03-MS PICKERING, CHARLES W REP $2,000 Senate-NY CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM DEM $2,000 Senate-TN CORKER, ROBERT P JR REP $2,000 Dist 07-TN BLACKBURN, MARSHA REP $2,000 Dist 06-TX BARTON, JOE LINUS REP $2,000 Senate-AL SHELBY, RICHARD C REP $1,000 Senate- AR PRYOR, MARK LUNSFORD DEM $1,000 Dist 10- CA TAUSCHER, ELLEN O DEM $1,000 Dist 22- CA MCCARTHY, KEVIN REP $1,000 Dist 49-CA ISSA, DARRELL EDWARD REP $1,000 Dist 14-FL MACK, CONNIE REP $1,500 Dist 05-IL EMANUEL, RAHM DEM $1,000 Senate-LA VITTER, DAVID REP $1,000 Dist 06-MI UPTON, FREDERICK STEPHEN REP $1,000 Senate-MS LOTT, TRENT REP $1,000 Dist 06-NC COBLE, JOHN HOWARD REP $1,000 Dist 09-NC MYRICK, SUE REP $1,000 Dist 02-NE TERRY, LEE REP $1,811 Dist 07-NY CROWLEY, JOSEPH DEM $1,000 Dist 10-NY TOWNS, EDOLPHUS DEM $1,500 Dist 28-NY SLAUGHTER, LOUISE M DEM $1,000 Dist 05-OH GILLMOR, PAUL E REP $1,000 Dist 01-OK SULLIVAN, JOHN REP $1,000 Dist 02-OR WALDEN, GREGORY PAUL REP $1,000 Dist 01-WA INSLEE, JAY R DEM $1,000 Senate-SD THUNE, JOHN REP $1,000 Dist 05-TN COOPER, JAMES H. S. DEM $1,500
It’s important to note that the top Democratic presidential hopefuls, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, made the list, whereas Republican presidential hopefuls in Congress, such as John McCain, did not.
This gives me the opportunity to leak some info: you’re going to see a massive community-led project on this site in the near future on this very subject. Stay tuned!
Note that there is contact info for each individual named above in the linked article.
For those of us who thought copyright law in the United States couldn’t possibly get any stronger, we were shocked and dismayed by the unveiling today of a new lobbyist group comprised of “backers of stronger copyright laws.” This group is led by the usual suspects: RIAA, MPAA, Microsoft, Viacom and Disney.
There was lots of talk about copyright owners who still want to get paid and promoting the vital role of copyright in the US economy. Nowhere to be found was any discussion about our right to access information and how current US copyright laws violate this basic human right.
2 good things came from the article. We now know which politicians in Washington to target:
The group’s formation drew applause from key politicians who preside over copyright law changes, including U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), who heads a key House panel that influences copyright laws.
The other thing that I came across, and I must stupidly admit to being entirely unaware of this, was the Digital Freedom Campaign, which apparently launched in October. On that page, you’ll see a link to sign a petition for the “Digital Freedom Bill of Sights and Sounds.” While personally I’d like to see less reliance on the word “digital” and more references to “information” (since all information is going digital, anyway), this looks like an effort worthy of more support. Sign the petition today!
Do you create software? Do you know someone who does? Take the BytesFree.org pledge. Promise not to make software that violates our information access rights.
Recent Comments